Creationists...evolutionists

I myself no not believe in the big bang theory, evolution or whatever you wish to call it. I dont think that it is possible to believe in it if you are a true christian because its too contridictory. If I evolved from an ape, then why are there still apes? And just exactly where did that ape come from?hmm…

“There is also so much evidence that this could be the truth.”

Really? Like what?

“If you ever go to an active church, you should notice most of them praising God on their own free will. I say that is all I need to believe.”

So what about all the other churches for other religions where they’re all praising (a different) god?

the thought of things… just happening… without divine guidance behind it, is ludicrous.

Please explain why the universe needs to have had a cause, or even a beginning.

The big bang explains the early expansion of the universe - and it’s well founded in evidence. It doesn’t explain the moment of inception, which is obviously kind of difficult to do, given that it’s at odds with everything we normally deal with, but Genesis certainly doesn’t do a better job of it.

I agree the big bang is based on factual evidence while creation is based soly based on the bible

That make the big bang more of a possability

I just wonder how God came into being…ever wonder where he came from? Seriously.

There are multiple forms of measurable evidence for the big bang. Genesis is obviously a story someone made up supported by nothing at all.

The big bang theory has some evidence to back it up in most parts - Genesis is just a story with no evidence and nothing to back it up.

Again, It depends on how you look at it. I believe in the big bang theroy because I don’t believe in any one god. I believe that all life just “came” to earth and the universe just made itself. In that fact, We are a continuing chain of big bangs as there probably was a smaller universe last time and then, well it gets bigger as we go along.

stable super atom

The singularity that arachnid is talking about is also much smaller than an atom, less than 10-33 (ten to the negative thirty-third power…not sure how to do scientific notation on here) cm in radius.

Hawking, who treats the universe like a particle in his quantum cosmology, supposes that this universe had a much higher probability of coming into existence than all other possible universes.

It’s also worth pointing out that the Big Bang does not characterize the universe as “something coming from nothing”. There is no such thing as nothing; even in a total vacuum, there is still quantum activity.

So if there’s no such thing as nothing and the current universe is by far the most probable, is it that hard to accept that the universe became what it is without a divine cause?

“stable super atom” sry I meant to put unstable I watch the science channel all te time & that’s what they called it. & I don’t believe something came from nothing, I’m just stating, something so small created something so big? I really don’t grasp that. & As I stated I don’t believe in divine intervention, I believe in the claps theory. I’m sure it can be looked up on a search engine

“An stable super atom that somehow causes a chain reaction that causes an explosion to scatter gasses”

There was no ‘stable super-atom’. There was a singularity of some sort, which wasn’t an atom - in fact, the early universe didn’t consist of any sort of matter we recognise at all.

“2 parallel universes collided”

What does it mean for two parallel universes to ‘collide’?

Agreed with Mandyloo

However I really don't believe in the big bag theory either, it's just...eh. An stable super atom that somehow causes a chain reaction that causes an explosion to scatter gasses, tons & tons of gasses, across the universe the little ittie bittie atom created seems a bit far fetched to me, though they've claimed to of found the smoking gun from the big bang(they've found NOTHING supporting genesis).
I believe in the claps theory. 2 parallel universes collided & created this universe. There are supposedly countless universes, it's likely there's collisions of the universes.

For the person who has had an awakening experience with God, the thought of things… just happening… without divine guidance behind it, is ludicrous.

However, for the person who has not yet had an encounter with the Creator, the thought of a being intelligent and powerful enough to actually speak this world and all its inhabitants into existance, and to fix it where it would be self sustaining… is just a ludicrous, and therein lies the dilema… we have both kinds of people on planet earth, and so it will be, as long as time continues as we know it.

I believe that it all depends on how you look at it. If you believe that there was a big bang and we were created, then that is what you believe. Personally, I believe in the creation. It makes more sense that there was a creator that created all that is living, one who gave life to all of us. There is also so much evidence that this could be the truth. If you ever go to an active church, you should notice most of them praising God on their own free will. I say that is all I need to believe.

I just wonder how the thing that went bang came into being.