Where is the line drawn between being bitten by a zombie and eaten

yeah.. but in return of the living dead, the guy put a pick axe through the zombies head, cut him up and he was still alive…

can you help help with that>?

in return …3 because the girl loved the guy so much she was having to hurt herself to stop the hunger- she still retained enough of her humanity for the pain to be temporarily effective in staving off her hunger.

as far as the eating /biting goes- I guess it all depends on just how ‘eaten’ you actually were, like the simple loss of your ‘viscera’, and an arm- you could still function as a zombie. there were rotted corpses coming to life- if they could come back then I guess it would be possible for your skeleton to carry on the destructive ‘zombie’ mission. so it appeared that your nervous system didn’t need to be very intact either. as long as you had a brain- you would be good to go. bites may only occur if the zombies got interupted and didn’t have sufficient time to finish eating your remains- so I think the answer to the question would be- the difference would be if you lost your brain or not ( where the line would be drawn). if I remember correctly- a ‘head shot’ was the only way to kill the zombies and shut down the process.