Theory of The Universe?

cynicaldarkness: But the ‘singularity’ isn’t on the surface of the balloon. Likewise, there’s no ‘center of the universe’, in the 3-dimensional sense, away from which everything is expanding.

I know I dont believe the stuff that the BIgBang crap.

…really? What exactly do you KNOW about it?

but howdoes this Universe work out? Blackholes?Wormholes?I don’t know this is very intresting to me.did we start from nothing?

You’re asking questions that don’t have answers… only speculation… is that what you want?

how come the world of the small is so very differnt and abides by very differnt laws then the world of the big. Look how chaotic the world of the atom is, and even the world of the particle. Look how perfect they all meld into eachother, and how perfect it fits. I belive it is to perfect to be random, but I dont belive in religion. I belive science is the study of nature, or the study of god.

Ok, so this is my passion. And yes, nobody knows much about this because we can only speculate based on observations made and comparisons to things we know. Im addition, I would not be so quick to dismiss the Big Bang theory due to its predictable nature and its tendency to fit in with most if not all macro and micro physics equations. Simple things such as the doppler effect can also be used to explain it. For example, when looking at other planets and solar systems from the vantage point of Earth, more accurately its orbit, we notice a small red shift in the spectrum. This is the doppler effect at work, showing a small progressive increase in the distance between us and everything around us. If we accept this, we can then assume that everything is moving away from everything else. With this in mind, we can come to the conclusion that there must be a focal point to this movement, thus giving us the center of the Big Bang.

You also asks about worm holes and black holes. These really do not apply to the creation of the Universe, but more to its destruction or recylcing as many believe. A black hole is basically an area of infinite mass (a singularity) that forms when a super giant implodes from a super nova. The “black” is formed from the absense of light due to the inability for anything to escape the gravity. Wormholes on the other hand are very different. Nobody really knows how they are formed, but it is hypothesized that they are tunnels throughout what is called the space-time mesh. To put it in visual terms, picture a piece of fabric that has been laid out, creashed, and possibly doubled up on itself. Light, or whatever you wish to picture must travel from Point A, around the creases and doublebacks in order to reach Point B. Now picture a small hole in the middle, a sort of extra piece of fabric between the doublebacks. Now light can travel through this to Point B in a much shorter time. This is supposedly the basis of wormholes and their applications to time travel; they do not come into play in the formation of the Universe.

I hope this helped. Feel free to email me if you have other questions, I love this stuff so I would be happy to answer

sorry I kind of melded my belifes into the question and forgot to ask the question itself. Heres my question(s). How come the world of the small abides by completly differnt laws then our world. And wouldnt the world of the big (galatic scale) abide by completly differnt laws? I mean theres so much we dont know. We have discovered that there is a super massive black hole in the center of every galaxy, but even tho the black whole is to far for its gravity to have any effect on the outer rims, the differnce in speed of the stars orbit is constant and is chartable. The theroy lies with the creation of galaxys but that states that all galaxys were once clouds of compated dusk, then some kind of spark happens and a super massive black whole forms, rotating the galaxys at super hi speeds and becomeing quaizars, fueling star creation. This is possible, but it dosent add up with the big bang. If the big bang occured then how did all those dusk particles gather into seperate gigantic clouds. Gravitiy? Is that even mathematicly possible? Gravity is a relitaly weak force, I mean the force eminiating of a tiny magnit can overpower the gravity of the earth. But its a weak force on a large scale. And at what point does the world of the small break down into its own laws of physics. I mean the cell still abides by our worlds laws, but what point does it cross the boundry line. Is there even a line? Where is it at and were does it end. The smaller it gets, the wierder the theroys.

captainassasin is right nobody in this world has the answers nobody knows how the universe was made, or even how big it is we havent even seen pictures of whats beyong our solar system everything is done with tecnology we havnt seen it, we dont know how it really works those are questions that we might never have the answers to but it is a question that has many unproven theories and for now, all people can do is keep comming up with them

Again, I would argue that proint. Everything expanded away from itself at a constant velocity, relative to everything else would suggest a focal point. Your balloon shows this. If you put the balloon in reverse and took it beyond physical limitations, the balloon would condense eventually to a singularity. I would agree with your point if it could be proven that heavenly objects were moving away from each other at several different rates, regardless of hinderances such as gravity and the space-time fabric.

“With this in mind, we can come to the conclusion that there must be a focal point to this movement, thus giving us the center of the Big Bang.”

Not quite accurate: The big bang wasn’t some explosion of matter in a universe that already existed, it was the expansion of the universe itself. There’s no ‘focal point’ because the entire universe expanded. It’s like drawing points on the surface of a balloon, and observing that when you inflate it, they all move away from each other - that doesn’t mean there’s a ‘focal point’ on the surface of the balloon.

If you’re interested, I’d suggest you read more about the big bang and stellar evolution. Parts of it are speculation, but most of it is solid science, and there’s probably a lot more to it than you think there is. Wikipedia is a good starting point.